I am very comfortable skiing above the knee powder on the 108 (I used to ski a 100) but others may prefer a 116 or wider. If you dont mind the 112 underfoot, that opens the field to a regular Wildcat, and again, for a 116 (except the 190) assuming you want them for deep days (your deep day and mine may be very different) again, I would grab the Wildcat. I could say you should be comparing the Wildcat 116 and not the 108 but, if you want more of a traditional ski, I would go with the CT. Skiers all have preferences or we would just have 5 skis on the market. I liked the 3.0 but its not as good across the board. I ski quite a bit of powder and the Wildcat, while still being a Charger, can be skied in almost any style and anywhere on the mountain with no compromises. The Wildcat 108 is my favorite powder skier ever. Last year, it was the Wildcat 108, Sali Stance 96 and Blossom SL as my "Best of the Season" skis, each in their own category of course but all 3 are quite strong skis. if the 2 skis are somewhat similar and you want them for the same thing, soft, loose snow and powder days, I'll take the Moment every time. The wildcat can be skied precise and engages exceptionally well in chopped, loose snow (or spring slush) it simply comes down to this. So without a deep dive here, you are comparing 2 skis that have a decent amount in common (both are chargers or can be skied that way) both are fairly stiff however the 3.0 is 112 underfoot and the Wildcat has considerably more splay but seemingly surpasses every other ski I've skied with that much splay.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |